Somehow there seems to be nothing about neo-liberalism that is of benefit to 99% of the world’s population. Yes, there are those fringe elements (politicians, employees of the financial sector and many others: crumbs falling from the banquet table) that still benefit from this, but for how long? And their children? So why is neo-liberalism still dominant?
Related Articles
Owen Jones: Don’t let the Tories fool you: we must borrow to invest
Here once again are most of the arguments for ending austerity and investing in the UK’s future and its people. The logic is valid for most EU nations. Read here Please see Simon Wren-Lewis on […]
Dutch Review: 7 Things to know about the Dutch election results of 2019
In the 2017 Dutch general election centrists thought they had turned the tide with regard to anti-EU sentiment in the Netherlands. Not anymore. With its neo-liberal policies the EU is still contributing to the rise […]
Thomas Piketty: Confronting war, rethinking sanctions
If an ordinary Russian loses half of his pension or salary because of the fall in the rouble and inflation caused by the sanctions, then there is no recourse, no court where he can complain. […]
Be the first to comment