This court case has been deemed inadmissible because, according to the courts, the plaintiffs have not been affected by climate change directly. Now if a transational corporation claimed that its profits are suffering from climate change that would surely be a completely different matter. That is the EU.
Related Articles
Anatol Lieven: Six months after Russian invasion, a bloody stalemate, a struggle for peace
The time for settlement is now — before tens of thousands more die and Ukraine has suffered still greater harm. Read Here Licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International
Bill Mitchell: Britain is now free of the legal neoliberalism that has killed prosperity in Europe
January 4, 2021
Mathew D. Rose
Austerity, Economics, EU politics, Finance, Inequality, National Politics, Neo-Liberalism in the EU, Regulation
0
Following Brexit people in Britain still have food, water, and electricity. The Pound has not collapsed. The COVID vaccine programme is up and running (despite the usual Tory corruption and incompetence). It is time to […]
Noah Lanard – How Joe Biden Became America’s Top Israel Hawk
The president once said “Israel could get into a fistfight with this country and we’d still defend” it. That is now clearer than ever. Read HERE
Be the first to comment