Jeffrey Sachs – The US Toppling of Imran Khan

Covert regime change strikes again. This time in Pakistan.

Jeffrey D. Sachs is a professor at Columbia University, Director of the Center for Sustainable Development at Columbia University and President of the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network. He has served as adviser to three UN Secretaries-General, and currently serves as an SDG Advocate under Secretary-General António Guterres.

Cross-posted from Common Dreams


A principal instrument of U.S. foreign policy is covert regime change, meaning a secret action by the U.S. government to bring down the government of another country. There are strong reasons to believe that U.S. actions led to the removal from power of Pakistan’s Prime Minister Imran Khan in April 2022, followed by his arrest on trumped-up charges of corruption and espionage, and sentencing this week to 10 years imprisonment on the espionage charge. The political objective is to block Pakistan’s most popular politician from returning to power in the elections on February 8.

The key to covert operations of course is that they are secret and hence deniable by the U.S. government. Even when the evidence comes to light through whistleblowers or leaks, as it very often does, the U.S. government rejects the authenticity of the evidence and the mainstream media generally ignore the story because it contradicts the official narrative. Because editors at these mainstream outlets don’t want to peddle in “conspiracy theories,” or are simply happy to be the mouthpieces for officialdom, they give the U.S. government a very wide berth for actual regime-change conspiracies.

Covert regime change by the U.S. is shockingly routine. One authoritative study by Boston University professor Lindsay O’Rourke counts 64 covert regime change operations by the U.S. during the Cold War (1947 and 1989), and in fact the number was far larger because she chose to count repeated attempts within one country as a single extended episode. Since then, U.S. regime change operations have remained frequent, such as when President Barrack Obama tasked the CIA (Operation Timber Sycamore) with overthrowing Syria’s President Bashar al-Assad. That covert operation remained secret until several years after the operation, and even then, was hardly covered by the mainstream media.

From the U.S. perspective, “neutral” is a fighting word.

All of this brings us to Pakistan, another case where evidence points strongly to U.S.-led regime change. In this case, the U.S. desired to bring down the government of Prime Minister Imran Khan, the charismatic, talented, and hugely popular leader in Pakistan, renowned both for his world-leading cricket mastery and for his common touch with the people. His popularity, independence, and enormous talents make him a prime target of the U.S., which frets about popular leaders who don’t fall into line with U.S. policy.

Imran Khan’s “sin” was to be too cooperative with Russian President Vladimir Putin and Chinese President Xi Jinping, while also seeking normal relations with the United States. The great mantra of U.S. foreign policy, and the activating principle of the CIA, is that a foreign leader is “either with us or against us.” Leaders who try to be neutral amongst the great powers are at dire risk of losing their positions, or even their lives, at U.S. instigation, since the U.S. does not accept neutrality. Leaders seeking neutrality dating back to Patrice Lumumba (Zaire), Norodom Sihanouk (Cambodia), Viktor Yanukovych (Ukraine), and many others, have been toppled with the not-so-hidden-hand of the U.S. government.

Like many leaders in the developing world, Khan does not want to break relations with either the U.S. or Russia over the Ukraine War. By sheer coincidence of prior scheduling, Khan happened to be in Moscow to meet Putin on the day that Russia launched the special military operation (February 24, 2022). From the start, Khan advocated that the conflict in Ukraine should be settled at the negotiating table rather than on the battlefield. The U.S. and E.U. arm-twisted foreign leaders including Khan to fall into line against Putin and to support Western sanctions against Russia, yet Khan resisted.

Khan probably sealed his fate on March 6 when he held a large rally in northern Pakistan. At the rally, he berated the West, and especially 22 EU ambassadors, for pressuring him to condemn Russia at a vote in the United Nations. He also excoriated NATO’s war against terror in next-door Afghanistan as having been utterly devastating to Pakistan, with no acknowledgment, respect, or appreciation for Pakistan’s suffering.

[Khan’s] popularity, independence, and enormous talents make him a prime target of the U.S., which frets about popular leaders who don’t fall into line with U.S. policy.

Khan told the cheering crowds, “EU ambassadors wrote a letter to us asking us to condemn and vote against Russia… What do you think of us? Are we your slaves … that whatever you say, we will do?” He added, “We are friends with Russia, and we are also friends with America; we are friends with China and with Europe; we are not in any camp. Pakistan would remain neutral and work with those trying to end the war in Ukraine.”

From the U.S. perspective, “neutral” is a fighting word. The grim follow-up for Khan was revealed in August 2023 by investigative reporters at The Intercept. Just one day after Khan’s rally, Assistant Secretary of State for the Bureau of South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu met in Washington with Pakistan’s Ambassador to the U.S., Asad Majeed Khan. Following the meeting, Ambassador Khan sent a secret cable (a “cypher”) back to Islamabad, which was then leaked to The Intercept by a Pakistani military official.

The cable recounts how Assistant Secretary Lu berated Prime Minister Khan for his neutral stance. The cable quotes Lu as saying that “people here and in Europe are quite concerned about why Pakistan is taking such an aggressively neutral position (on Ukraine), if such a position is even possible. It does not seem such a neutral stand to us.”

Lu then conveyed the bottom line to Ambassador Khan. “I think if the no-confidence vote against the Prime Minister succeeds, all will be forgiven in Washington because the Russia visit is being looked at as a decision by the Prime Minister. Otherwise, I think it will be tough going ahead.”

Five weeks later on April 10, with the U.S. blunt threat hanging over the powerful Pakistani military, and with the military’s hold over the Pakistani parliament, the Parliament ousted Khan in a no-confidence vote. Within weeks, the new government followed with brazenly manufactured charges of corruption against Khan, to put him under arrest and prevent his return to power. In utterly Orwellian turn, when Khan made known the existence of the diplomatic cable that revealed America’s role in his ouster, the new government charged Khan with espionage. He has now been convicted on these charges to an unconscionable 10 years, with the U.S. government remaining silent on this outrage.

When asked about Khan’s conviction, the State Department had the following to say: “It’s a matter for the Pakistani courts.” Such an answer is a vivid example of how U.S.-led regime change works. The State Department supports Khan’s imprisonment over Khan’s public revelation of U.S. actions.

Pakistan will therefore hold elections on February 8 with its most popular democratic leader in prison and with Khan’s party the subject of relentless attacks, political murders, media blackouts, and other heavy-handed repression. In all of this, the U.S. government is utterly complicit. So much for America’s “democratic” values. The U.S. government has gotten its way for now—and has deeply destabilized a nuclear-armed nation of 240 million people. Only Khan’s release from prison and his participation in the upcoming election could restore stability.

Thanks to many generous donors BRAVE NEW EUROPE  will be able to continue its work for the rest of 2024 in a reduced form. What we need is a long term solution. So please consider making a monthly recurring donation. It need not be a vast amount as it accumulates in the course of the year. To donate please go HERE.


    • Khan is popular and at the same extremely inept and hypocritical. His performance during his tenure as PM was so poor that had he been allowed to complete his term (ie not ousted by a no confidence vote which is democratic) he would have lost a lot of public support and confidence.
      His rhetoric against the US, which has always been a crowd pleaser, gave him second wind. He forgot to mention, of course, how he wiggled his way into power and how he incarcerated honest professionals and supported trumped up charges against good and decent people. They say what goes round comes round. this is now his turn to pay for his misdemeanors and and the injustice he promoted AND supported in his time as PM. These are facts and not a conspiracy against him. I hope he learns from this and if he does he may yet be this country’s saviour.

      • If whatever you’re saying is true then how come right after his departure the numbers released by the SBP during the PDM government tell a different story?
        Despite the Covid crisis which took toll on quite a few world economies Pakistani economy during Khan’s time crossed 6.1 % GDP?

  1. Hats off to Jeffery D. Sachs. There are still people in this world who are not afraid of supper powers and have the courage to tell the truth.

  2. Hats off to Jeffery D. Sachs. There are still people in this world who are not afraid of supper powers and have the courage to tell the truth. And many thanks to Brave New Europe (BNE) who published and proved that they are really ‘Brave’.

  3. Thank you very much for this very honest analysis, Professor Sachs. Thanks to US interference Pakistan will again be saddled with ignorant, corrupt and inept rulers. But there is little point in blaming anyone. Those who are supposed to guard Pakistan’s borders, are the looters of Pakistan themselves. We are indeed an unfortunate nation

  4. Thanks for your write up on Regime Change in Pakistan by the USA. This will be a witness, one day, when the world shall get together and bring USA to justice for causing so much violence and loss of life. Every Dog has its day.

  5. if only a hypocritical behaviour of USA & west changes,the World will be at peace.Sooner ot ostracised better it is.USA & Europe has much more to offer the world instead of getting into these bitchy things.Let people of respective countries run and control their day to day matters in genuine democracy ,and not the trusted upon regimes and parties.

  6. Imran Khan was and is a man of the highest integrity and intellect. He is one the greatest Pakistani that ever lived. Instead of honouring such a hero, the Pakistani establishment have chosen to try to kill him, and when that failed, imprison him on trumped up charges with vindictive zeal. In Pakistan, the PM has responsibility but the Army through it’s intelligence wing, the ISI, has the authority and they use it ruthlessly. Ultimately, US wants a compliant state, a subservient army and political elite that will do their bidding. They do not want a resurgent Pakistan who could become a powerful Muslim voice with nuclear weapons to boot. So every effort was taken to break him and his movement for justice. Unfortunately the seed for change has been planted by Imran khan with that his job is done and for which the country will be forever grateful. He has awoken the masses and given them hope and laid out a vision for the future. As they say, you cannot kill an idea whose time has come. Imran Khan is now the very embodiments of that idea. His shadow will hand long over Pakistani for years to come.

  7. Europe has an Enemy sitting at the gate known as Uncle SAM. The enemy in the camouflage of Best Friend is Fucking Europe but the British, German and French Leadership is on payroll of SAM. So simple an Equation.

    • Excellent and realistic analysis. Obviously there are many other countries that are subservient to US interests.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.