The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed massive failures of governance at the global and national levels. Global health governance failed rapidly, with action quickly becoming nationally based, uncoordinated, and often zero-sum. However, domestic health governance also often fared very poorly, even in some of the wealthiest countries, which were ostensibly best-prepared to deal with a pandemic. Why? We argue that this reflects the inherent pathologies of the shift from‘government to governance’ and of the‘regulatory state’ it had spawned. This has resulted in the hollowing-out of effective state capacities, the dangerous diffusion of responsibility,and de facto reliance on ad hoc emergency measures to contain crises. We demonstrate this through a detailed case study of Britain, where regulatory governance and corporate outsourcing failed miserably, contrasting this with the experience of South Korea, where the regulatory state form was less well established and even partially reversed.
Related Articles

Climate Crisis
Reuters: European Investment Bank postpones decision on fossil fuel lending
October 16, 2019
Mathew D. Rose
Climate Crisis, Energy, EU politics, EU-Institutions, National Politics, Sustainability
0
Why does the EU have to support Germany’s natural gas industry? Once again the “Environment Chancellor”, Angela Merkel, has only one goal: increasing profits for corporations. Read here

EU politics
Renegade Inc: The Royal Bank of Scotland & the largest theft anywhere, ever…
Some things never change. Governments still protect banks. It does not matter what they do, as with the Royal Bank of Scotland. Read here

Economics
Bill Mitchell: Helping ease food insecurity and starvation requires governments to ban bankers speculating on food prices
Governments are captive to the big food speculators and big farm corporations Read Here DFID – UK Department for International Development licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 Generic
Be the first to comment