The COVID-19 pandemic has exposed massive failures of governance at the global and national levels. Global health governance failed rapidly, with action quickly becoming nationally based, uncoordinated, and often zero-sum. However, domestic health governance also often fared very poorly, even in some of the wealthiest countries, which were ostensibly best-prepared to deal with a pandemic. Why? We argue that this reflects the inherent pathologies of the shift from‘government to governance’ and of the‘regulatory state’ it had spawned. This has resulted in the hollowing-out of effective state capacities, the dangerous diffusion of responsibility,and de facto reliance on ad hoc emergency measures to contain crises. We demonstrate this through a detailed case study of Britain, where regulatory governance and corporate outsourcing failed miserably, contrasting this with the experience of South Korea, where the regulatory state form was less well established and even partially reversed.
Related Articles

Deregulation
The Local se: Sweden’s government collapses as prime minister loses no-confidence vote
June 21, 2021
Mathew D. Rose
Deregulation, Economics, EU politics, Finance, National Politics, Neo-Liberalism in the EU
0
Sweden’s parliament has voted in favour of a no-confidence motion against Social Democrat Prime Minister Stefan Löfven, a historic result that means the country could face snap elections later this year. He must now resign […]

EU politics
The Independent: Emmanuel Macron branded ‘hero of the rich’ for cutting taxes for the wealthiest in new French budget
Emmanuel Macron seems to be pushing through a neo-liberal policy that once again enriches the few and immiserates the many. What else is new in the European Union? Read here

EU politics
El Nacional.Cat: Poland and Romania align with Spain against Puigdemont over EU justice questions
EU countries with submissions on exiled Catalan politicians’ case have presented their arguments to Luxembourg court Read here
Be the first to comment