Are Uber drivers ‘limb (b) workers’ and so entitled to fundamental statutory rights such as the minimum wage and working time protections? In a decision of fundamental significance, six Justices of the United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) upheld the original Employment Tribunal (ET) decision that the drivers were ‘limb (b) workers. In reaching this conclusion, the UKSC endorsed the ‘purposive’ approach that had been set down in the earlier case of Autoclenz v Belcher by Lord Clarke.
Behind the judgement passed by the Spanish Supreme Court one recognises how present Franco still is in Spanish politics. Read here
It seems the EU and Britain are in a race to be the most hypocritical. Read Here This file comes from the website of the President of the Russian Federation and is licensed under the […]
Washington could lose much of its international influence if policymakers don’t change their approach. A Q&A with Aude Darnal. Read Here
Copyright © 2023 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes
Be the first to comment