In Part 1, I introduced the discussion about the use of industry policies in the Keynesian period after World War 2. Most nations adopted a mixed planning-market based system for allocating productive resources and the state was always central in setting out planning parameters, direct ownership and employment, and regulation. It was a system that researchers described as being “highly successful”.
Related Articles
Owen Jones: Talk to Deliveroo couriers. See a dystopia that could be your future
May 24, 2018
Mathew D. Rose
EU politics, Finance, Gig Economy, National Politics, Neo-Liberalism in the EU
0
The gig economy via tech platforms have become the epitomy of modern worker exploitation. How workers are fighting back. Read here
Rupert Read: Inside COP26. It’s like a tornado that may end in a whimper
After a chaotic start to COP26, Professor Rupert Read from the University of East Anglia reports on events in Glasgow. Read here
Duroyan Fertl: Climate Neutrality and Democratic Ownership after COVID
December 18, 2021
Mathew D. Rose
Climate Crisis, Energy, Environment, Solutions, Sustainability, Transport
0
The challenges of a socially just transition to clean energy, with former Copenhagen City councillor Ulrik Kohl. Kohl, a researcher on community energy in the Nordic countries and Southeast Europe with Malmö University and Roskilde […]
Be the first to comment