A brewing sovereign debt crisis threatens to engulf as many as sixty-one countries in debt distress over the coming year. Aid flowing from the global North—which carries the most responsibility for the atmospheric carbon stock—to the global South—which bears the brunt of its impacts—must be dramatically scaled up. Despite professing the need for global climate solutions, governments in the more prosperous countries have responded to this threat with lassitude and indifference, as evidenced by the slate of unambitious, unserious, and demonstrably ineffective responses issued from their recent summits. Meanwhile, democratic deficits within the institutions of multilateral governance show the difficulty of grappling with the pronounced asymmetries in our international financial architecture. Even the most ambitious reforms slated for discussion at week’s Summit on a New Global Financing Pact in Paris fail to confront the fundamental role of debt in that asymmetrical architecture.
Related Articles
Climate Crisis
Bill Mitchell: Modest (insipid) Green New Deal proposals miss the point – Part 1
July 26, 2019
Mathew D. Rose
Climate Crisis, Economics, Finance, Green New Deal, Inequality, Monopolies, Neo-Liberalism in the EU, Solutions, Sustainability
0
The response to climate change can only be a robust economic, political, and social revolution, but we have a lot of people tinkering on the edges. Read here Read Part 2 here
Corruption
Corporate Europe Observatory, Change Finance: The BlackRock Model
How the EU is choosing the wrong path on banks and climate change Read here
Climate Crisis
Steve Keen – The appallingly bad neoclassical economics of climate change
Steve’s paper exposing the dreadful work on climate change done by William Nordhaus (and his band of like-simpleminded Neoclassical economists) has now been published by the journal Globalizations. The link is here: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14747731.2020.1807856

Be the first to comment