The question then that remains the relevant one now is why did it take an angry lawyer to force HMRC to fact and collect tax that was very obviously owing? Why didn’t they want to collect £1.5 billion?
Related Articles
El Pais: Madrid regional premier Cristina Cifuentes quits after video of her shoplifting emerges
This story is a metaphor for much of Europe’s political elite: A master’s degree from a university that had absolutely no basis in reality. All records have been lost. Shoplifting (she claims to have paid […]
Corporate Europe Observatory: How corporate lobbying undermined the EU’s push to ban surveillance ads
January 18, 2022
Mathew D. Rose
Corruption, EU politics, EU-Institutions, Media, Media Concentration, Regulation
0
Despite the EU’s talk about regulating the digital sphere, we uncover how Big Tech has successfully waged a major lobbying campaign to prevent a ban on their extremely profitable model of intrusive surveillance advertising. However […]
Steve Keen: Economic failures of the IPCC process
This post contains new information on Nordhaus’s distortion of Lenton et al.’s 2008 paper on tipping elements in the Earth’s climate, but is otherwise very similar to my recent paper in Globalizations. It is a […]
Be the first to comment