European elites have argued that ‘peripheral’ Eurozone states such as Greece and Ireland must ‘follow the rules’ if they are to secure sustainable economic recoveries. The problem is that ‘following the rules’ of European integration – particularly in the domain of financial services – drove divergence and led to the original crisis in these economies
Neil Dooley is Lecturer in Politics at Sussex European Institute (Sei), University of Sussex
Nearly ten years on from the first Greek bailout, the countries of the eurozone periphery have exhibited markedly divergent recoveries. A popular narrative attributes the contrasting recoveries of Greece and Ireland to their divergent enthusiasm for following EU rules on structural reforms and austerity. In contrast, my new book, The European Periphery and the Eurozone Crisis, shows that ‘following the rules’ doesn’t always ensure good economic health, but is linked to the causes of the eurozone crisis in the first place.
If you like this kind of article and want to see more writing free of state or corporate media bias and free of charge, please donate here. We welcome your support.
We are in the midst of our Fundraising 2019, so please give generously.
Public debt has been an important tool for furthering neo-liberal policies, especially in the EU. In the Great Financial Crisis not only did governments have to bail out private banks, but clean up the economic […]
Columbia law professor Tim Wu on The Curse of Bigness, neo-Brandeisian antitrust, and the lessons we should learn from the first Gilded Age. Cross-posted from Pro Market The blog of the Stigler Center at the University […]
If you leave it to economists to explain the wave of homelessness for the past decade, one receives a dry statistical analysis. Most of the media puts the blame on Russian oligarchs or Airbnb. Danny […]