Somehow there seems to be nothing about neo-liberalism that is of benefit to 99% of the world’s population. Yes, there are those fringe elements (politicians, employees of the financial sector and many others: crumbs falling from the banquet table) that still benefit from this, but for how long? And their children? So why is neo-liberalism still dominant?
Related Articles
Corporate Europe Observatory: Vaccine transparency case is still not closed, despite EC’s claim
Read here
The Asahi Shimbun – Stephanie Kelton: Japan shatters notion of deficit boogeyman
Modern monetary theory (MMT) is gaining much attention for its somewhat unorthodox view that governments do not have to worry about fiscal deficits. One of the main advocates of MMT is Stephanie Kelton, an economics […]
George Monbiot: Look to Sheffield: this is how state and corporate power subverts democracy
The destructiveness and reach of neo-liberalism is made clear in this piece by George Monbiot. It is a question of felling some trees in the city of Sheffield in the UK, but one can see […]
Be the first to comment