Conventional economics is built around the idea of opportunity cost. If there is a limited resource a decision has to be made about how best to use it. How is that principle applied when you look at Modern Monetary Theory, when governments can create money without limits until you have reached a point of full employment. There is no need to look at one choice over another. Perhaps you can do both? So, what determines how money is spent? Are those spending decisions left in the hands of politicians? Steve Keen says, to start with, the theory of opportunity cost should be ditched because it only applies at a personal level. He explains why that is, but agrees with Phil that politics is the big stumbling block when it comes to the practical application of MMT.
Related Articles

Geopolitics
Peter Beinart – From Greenland to Gaza
5 February 2025 Listen HERE What Greenland and Gaza Have in Common The New American Imperialism

Austerity
Michael Hudson – Rescuing the Banks Instead of the Economy
November 6, 2018
Mathew D. Rose
Austerity, Economics, Finance, Financial Institutions, Globalisation, Inequality, Monopolies, Neo-Liberalism in the EU, Privatisation, Tax
0
2018 marks the 10th anniversary of the stock market crash of 2008; the current financial malaise is the result of the bank bailouts, not the crash; an over-indebted economy cannot be saved unless the banks […]

Finance
The Real News: UK Household Debt has Reached Unsustainable Levels
Consumer and student debt in the UK have reached unprecedented levels and are a warning that austerity could lead to a new financial crisis, explains Positive Money’s economist Edward Smythe in this interview for The […]
Be the first to comment