The EU did a Brexit trade deal with the pharma industry: it tried to lock in a perceived short-term price advantage at the expense of everything else. Instead of prioritising the speed and security of supplies at any price, the EU prioritised the price. The EU paid 24% less for the Pfizer vaccine than the US, for example. For the Oxford/AstraZeneca vaccine, the price gap is 45%. The UK almost certainly paid a lot more. It is no wonder that the manufacturers are prioritising orders on a first-come, first-serve basis, and from countries that pay the full price. The price difference is macroeconomically irrelevant. But if vaccine shortages lead to longer lockdowns, the indirect effect of that short-sighted policy will be massive.
Related Articles

Media
Jonathan Cook: Social media’s erasure of Palestinians is a grim warning for our future
Facebook, Google and Twitter are not neutral platforms. They control the digital public square to aid the powerful – and can cancel any of us overnight Read here

Climate Crisis
Hamza Hamouchene: Green Hydrogen: The new scramble for North Africa
November 20, 2021
Mathew D. Rose
Climate Crisis, Economics, Energy, EU politics, Finance, National Politics, Sustainability
0
European plans for hydrogen energy projects in North Africa smack of green colonialism. Read here

Climate Crisis
Yale Environment 360 – Energy Hogs: Can World’s Huge Data Centers Be Made More Efficient?
Data centres eat up more than 2 percent of the world’s electricity and emit roughly as much CO2 as the airline industry. This is a fact that is conveniently being ignored. Read here
Be the first to comment