James Galbraith discusses the unintended effects of Western sanctions on Russia, arguing that they have, in many respects, benefited the Russian economy in the long term. Contrary to the goals of defunding the war and degrading Russia’s military capacity, sanctions have led to economic adjustments that have fostered Russia’s independent development. Galbraith points out that despite initial disruptions, Russia adapted by focusing on domestic production and diversifying its economic partnerships. This analysis provides a nuanced view of economic sanctions’ real-world impacts, suggesting that their effectiveness and consequences are more complex than commonly understood.
Related Articles
Finance
Steve Keen – PATREON: Why the poor pay for high debt, even if they don’t borrow (in 13 minutes & 15 seconds flat)
This was an invited talk to public servants organized by the Exploring Economics group (https://www.exploring-economics.org/en/). In just over 13 minutes Keen provides a complex systems argument that the poor pay for debt, even if they […]
EU politics
Yanis Varoufakis – Europe Has Become a War Project
11 June 2025
Economics
The Finance Curse – Professor Gerald Epstein
Dr. Gerald Epstein is Professor of Economics and founding Co-Director of the Political Economy Research Institute (PERI) at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. Among his many excellent works he and Juan Antonio Montecino calculated the […]

Be the first to comment