There are the deniers who will argue that mankind has no influence on climate, but worse yet, there are economists who argue the impact will be so small the cost of trying to prevent it will be far greater than the consequences of living with it. That’s the line taken by joint Nobel prizewinner William Nordhaus. In this week’s edition of the Debunking Economics podcast Prof Steve Keen takes Phil Dobbie through some of the spurious arguments and assumptions used by Nordhaus to reach his spurious conclusions. Some of them defy logic. If you offered them in a high school science exam, you’d probably fail.
Related Articles
Geopolitics
Chas Freeman, Glenn Diesen: Thucydides Trap and US Reaction to China’s Rise
4 December 2025 Watch HERE
Geopolitics
Mark Sleboda, Rachel Blevins – Update on War in Ukraine
12 September 2024 Both Biden and Blinken have now indicated that the White House is getting ready to lift restrictions on the long-range missiles the U.S. sends Kiev, and grant Zelensky’s wish to use the […]
Economics
Steve Keen – Five Big Myths of Classical Economics
It’s taken us a few years to tackle the obvious topic for the Debunking Economics podcast, what are the biggest failings of neoclassical economics. Prof Steve Keen tells Phil Dobbie that it starts on page […]

Be the first to comment