There are the deniers who will argue that mankind has no influence on climate, but worse yet, there are economists who argue the impact will be so small the cost of trying to prevent it will be far greater than the consequences of living with it. That’s the line taken by joint Nobel prizewinner William Nordhaus. In this week’s edition of the Debunking Economics podcast Prof Steve Keen takes Phil Dobbie through some of the spurious arguments and assumptions used by Nordhaus to reach his spurious conclusions. Some of them defy logic. If you offered them in a high school science exam, you’d probably fail.
Related Articles
Economics
Michael Hudson, Alexander Mercouris, Glenn Diesen – Trump’s Economic Recovery a Dead End?
17 Ferbruary 2025 We spoke with the renowned economist Michael Hudson regarding Trump’s plan for economic recovery. The use of tariffs was important for US industrialisation throughout the 19th century as it enabled infant industries […]
Climate Crisis
GPEnewsdocs: Robert Pollin – Fossil Fuel Industry Phase-Out: Three Critical Worker Guarantees for a Just Transition
Robert Pollin says PERI research findings published in ‘Fossil Fuel Industry Phase-Out and Just Transition’ demonstrate Just Transition policies are easily affordable in all high-income countries and imperative for any serious prospect of success in […]
Finance
The Paradise Papers: a Tax Justice UK briefing
A virtual briefing and Q&A on the Paradise Papers, what they mean for the UK’s tax system, and what we can do to fix it. Juliette Garside is a financial correspondent at the Guardian, who […]

Be the first to comment