There are the deniers who will argue that mankind has no influence on climate, but worse yet, there are economists who argue the impact will be so small the cost of trying to prevent it will be far greater than the consequences of living with it. That’s the line taken by joint Nobel prizewinner William Nordhaus. In this week’s edition of the Debunking Economics podcast Prof Steve Keen takes Phil Dobbie through some of the spurious arguments and assumptions used by Nordhaus to reach his spurious conclusions. Some of them defy logic. If you offered them in a high school science exam, you’d probably fail.
Related Articles
Economics
Michael Hudson – Eleven Objectives of Neoliberalism
August 13, 2023
Mathew D. Rose
Economics, Finance, Financial Institutions, Inequality, Monopolies, Neo-Liberalism in the EU, Privatisation, Tax
0
A series of lectures will be coming out of my relationship with Hong Kong’s Global University of Sustainability. These have been tiered to a Chinese audience, revealing another layer to my work.
Corruption
Double Down News: Peter Jukes – The Weaponisation of Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories
March 21, 2021
Mathew D. Rose
Corruption, Economics, Fake News, Finance, Lobbying, Media, Media Concentration, Media Influence, Political Parties, Regulatory Capture
0
A good summing up of the lodestar of journalism – and for any political thinking – follow the money. The Weaponisation of Coronavirus Conspiracy Theories @peterjukes pic.twitter.com/HkQDXWmb1i — Double Down News (@DoubleDownNews) September 8, […]
Geopolitics
Alastair Crooke, Judge Napolitano – The Middle East One year after October 7th 2023
7 October 2024

Be the first to comment